Bad Webcomics Wiki

Hey everyone! What happens when you get a website full of jealous, scaredy wimpass, and jade blooded losers who can't draw or write worth shit, and/or are too scared to tiptoe into the waters of exposure, and pent up all of their rage, frustration, anger, and society fermented bitterness over taking it up the ass, that even gets us at ED to go "wow man, you fuckin' lulcows at this point" ?

That's easy. You get the Bad Webcomics Wiki.

Why it sucks, or in BWW's words, "FAGGOT FAGGOT FAGGOT FAGGOT"

Apparently people who didn't get the message that being like the fucking backasses at Channel Assdump and getting the point that they were bandwagoning on a trend that someone did earlier thought it would be a great idea to put such format into endless, droning, incessant, and insufferable amounts of words (ie. "weaboos cocks sucks weeaboos weebs caustic humor that should die along with the Columbine victims back in the 1990s "bad writing") to where you'd honestly rather read what they were "reviewing" upfront for the sake of entertainment value alone. Much like how Internet reviewing is the sign of the dearth of American first world entertainment because smart alecky nitpicking pedantic edgelord whining spectators will die fruitless and with nothing to contribute to the world other than their own feces, The Bad Webcomics Wiki is essentially in the process of trying to plant its own flag like how a company of GIs are trying to recreate Iwo Jima by bayonet fucking an Okinawan woman to death. Practically the entire site can be summed up by the lyrics of Nelly and his hit song Number One: "I'm tired of all these suckas tryin' ta debate what's real hip hop; most of the time them fuckin' niggas fuckin' album flopped".

TL;DR; to wake up most of the faggotmaggots from Bad Webcomics Wiki with a rude awakening, you're the next best thing since Doug Walker. Don't get all moralfag with us over how "All content on the BWW is potentially Not Suitable For Work, detrimental to mental health, and heavily interspersed with caustic humor that is regularly abused as a pretense to ignore our advice. You Have Been Warned." Motherfuckers, we've done this since 2006. The fuck are you?

How to write for Bad Webcomics Wiki

1. Take any webcomic off of the net
2. Go for the lowest lowbrow traits to nitpick off of
3. Have incredibly nonexistent or insatiable criterion like 99.9% of the reviewing industry who don't know what the fuck they're talking about or know what they're doing most of the time
4. Get insufferably smarmy and use swear words like "a big man"
5. Circlejerk in IRC
6. ????
7. Profit.

For good or decent webcomics that don't fit your tastes

1. Find subjective flaws to nitpick
2. Have incredibly nonexistent or insatiable criterion like 99.9% of the reviewing industry who don't know what the fuck they're talking about or know what they're doing most of the time
3. Get insufferably smarmy and use swear words like "a big man"
4. Circlejerk in IRC
5. ????
6. Profit.

Important tips to remember if you want to writer for Bad Webcomics Wiki

• Remember, we hire actual Neo nazis! That'll show those bad webcomics writers who's boss! We'll even get him to promote how anime based webcomics isn't all bad for publicity!
• Remember, all writers and artists who draw in anime style are retard weeaboos and we need to emphasize that. It's not like if you don't like anime you can be an insufferable mouthy lowbrow low hanging branch aiming faggot who comes from a White man's country cultural background, and even when we do, we are the exception!
• Remember, you can post up an author's legitimate reaction to your review, and leave it on the site for all of you and our dicksucking lapdogs to laugh at to our own self satisfaction!
• Remember, you can use your reviews to bully, discriminate, and bash on people, even teenagers and young adults, into drawing and writing better! We're the fair and just gatekeepers of internet webcomics, where the freedom of speech prevails! Except for webcomics, we totally have all and any authority on who should and shouldn't, even if it's just for a hobby or if they're beginners and amateurs, and don't know how to properly deal with us swearing at them and telling them they suck like an abusive fuckoff.

Dickmeasuring contest with ED

Fun Fact: The Bad Webcomics Wiki is not a substitute for ED. ED is purposely made for lulz and drama, and as much as we dickjerk ourselves dry, we at least have the fucking beef to show that we go the distance. The Bad Webcomics Wiki is like the bully at your school who is purposefully raised to pick on specific people, and by some point, no one's going to help them when they get some free buckshot mouthwash by one of their victims. ED is more like the gang of anonymous hoodlums who target anyone for anything, and depending on how their victims react, it's all back on them.

Most importantly, ED isn't some retarded pussyfoot faggotass "reviewing" wiki with an agenda and a bunch of cowards "trying to change something". Anything goes, and depending on how it's written, it flies like a free country's air space into the World Trade Centers all over again. And even if most of the userbase doesn't like it, that writer can say "EAT A DICK" and go along their merry way. ED is MEANT for spite of anyone and anything. At least we're honest in that we don't give a fuck who we offend and how we do it. Whatever chaos comes after, that's your fucking dealio, asshole.

Furthermore, when we had the laydown on Bleedman and all of the other shitheap webcomics, that's when you know it was bad. As much as ED hides behind monikers and anonymous posters, we didn't just do it first, we're the authority on lolcows and all sorts of fucktard fuckery. Bad Webcomics Wiki is about as credible as some basement dwelling manhood insecure gamer's offhand video game dedicated website to the video game industry who flails at imaginary foes born out of their own jenkem from being in their lairs for too long.

BAWW THEY'RE PROMOTING BAD WEBCOMICS

Wow, you're just like Channel Assdumb!