2/10 Would Not Bang: Difference between revisions
< 2
imported>Mr Jonzz Suck my {{Stub}} fgts... |
→10/10 Would Bang: r u editing every page on ED in alphabetical order lol |
||
| (25 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
| Line 39: | Line 39: | ||
File:10 10 Would Bang 7.jpg | File:10 10 Would Bang 7.jpg | ||
File:10 10 Would Bang 8.jpg | File:10 10 Would Bang 8.jpg | ||
File:Shes a keeper.png | |||
</gallery>}} | </gallery>}} | ||
==Would Not X== | ==Would Not X== | ||
| Line 59: | Line 59: | ||
==External links== | ==External links== | ||
{{kym|memes/210-would-not-bang|2/10 Would Not Bang}} | {{kym|memes/210-would-not-bang|2/10 Would Not Bang}} | ||
*[http://slacktory.com/2012/01/2-10-would-not-bang-4chan/ 2/10 Would Not Bang: 4chan’s Funniest New Meme] • ''Slacktory.com (01/25/12)'' | *[https://web.archive.org/web/20120128182527/http://slacktory.com/2012/01/2-10-would-not-bang-4chan/#disqus_thread 2/10 Would Not Bang: 4chan’s Funniest New Meme] • ''Slacktory.com (01/25/12)'' | ||
==See also== | ==See also== | ||
| Line 65: | Line 65: | ||
*[[FGAS]] | *[[FGAS]] | ||
*[[I'd hit it]] | *[[I'd hit it]] | ||
*[[DO NOT WANT]] | |||
{{memes}} | {{memes}} | ||
[[Category:Image Macros]] | [[Category:Image Macros]] | ||
[[Category:Galleries]] | [[Category:Galleries]] | ||
Latest revision as of 13:38, 16 September 2025
 |
2/10 Would Not Bang is an image macro series originating from 4chan in which photographs of unattractive women, in some instances men, are critically analysed and annotated with a view to highlighting their individual shortcomings.
10/10 Would Bang
10/10 Would Bang is a related image macro series however, rather than pointing out the failings in a subject it attempts to emphasize features which contribute to their overall level of attractiveness.
Would Not X
External links
- 2/10 Would Not Bang: 4chan’s Funniest New Meme • Slacktory.com (01/25/12)
See also
|
2/10 Would Not Bang is part of a series on Visit the Memes Portal for complete coverage. |