Economy - Revision history

Omari81 at 23:27, 13 May 2026

2026-05-13T23:27:02Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:27, 13 May 2026
Line 89:		Line 89:
	[[Image:For_great_economic_justice.jpg\|thumb\|It will all end in [[lulz\|tears]].]]		[[Image:For_great_economic_justice.jpg\|thumb\|It will all end in [[lulz\|tears]].]]
	[[Image:GoldandSilver.jpg\|thumb\|Get your own stack.]]		[[Image:GoldandSilver.jpg\|thumb\|Get your own stack.]]
	[[~~File~~:Herbert Hoover.jpg\|thumb\|[[Herbert Hoover\|This guy]] knows a thing or two about the economy. Look up "hooverville" for more details.]]		[[Image:Herbert Hoover.jpg\|thumb\|[[Herbert Hoover\|This guy]] knows a thing or two about the economy. Look up "hooverville" for more details.]]

	This is just too obvious, and also too easy, like taking [[candy]] from a [[baby]]. But try, for example, accusing someone of committing the "Lump of Labor" fallacy, or some [[gay]] shit like that (and don't forget to also [http://groups.google.com/group/alt.politics.immigration/tree/browse_frm/thread/9ec4174fdd493db0/7b0c1d449f82f729?rnum=41&hl=en&_done=%2Fgroup%2Falt.politics.immigration%2Fbrowse_frm%2Fthread%2F9ec4174fdd493db0%2F65d61bc29c1a7b55%3Ftvc%3D1%26hl%3Den%26#doc_8382dfc9617b7525 flame his spelling]). Or try telling a bunch of [[woman\|hysterical]] [[fucktard]]s that they should like [[Wal-Mart]] because it creates jobs.[http://community.livejournal.com/anti_sweatshops/2150.html#t7782] If you come across a math type then one can ask for a mathematical proof of the viability of the fractional reserve system under dynamic conditions. When one needs to end an argument and return his broker's margin call, one need simply post high-resolution pictures of gold, guns, or ammo and pawn any economic argument.		This is just too obvious, and also too easy, like taking [[candy]] from a [[baby]]. But try, for example, accusing someone of committing the "Lump of Labor" fallacy, or some [[gay]] shit like that (and don't forget to also [http://groups.google.com/group/alt.politics.immigration/tree/browse_frm/thread/9ec4174fdd493db0/7b0c1d449f82f729?rnum=41&hl=en&_done=%2Fgroup%2Falt.politics.immigration%2Fbrowse_frm%2Fthread%2F9ec4174fdd493db0%2F65d61bc29c1a7b55%3Ftvc%3D1%26hl%3Den%26#doc_8382dfc9617b7525 flame his spelling]). Or try telling a bunch of [[woman\|hysterical]] [[fucktard]]s that they should like [[Wal-Mart]] because it creates jobs.[http://community.livejournal.com/anti_sweatshops/2150.html#t7782] If you come across a math type then one can ask for a mathematical proof of the viability of the fractional reserve system under dynamic conditions. When one needs to end an argument and return his broker's margin call, one need simply post high-resolution pictures of gold, guns, or ammo and pawn any economic argument.

Omari81 at 23:26, 13 May 2026

2026-05-13T23:26:45Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:26, 13 May 2026
Line 89:		Line 89:
	[[Image:For_great_economic_justice.jpg\|thumb\|It will all end in [[lulz\|tears]].]]		[[Image:For_great_economic_justice.jpg\|thumb\|It will all end in [[lulz\|tears]].]]
	[[Image:GoldandSilver.jpg\|thumb\|Get your own stack.]]		[[Image:GoldandSilver.jpg\|thumb\|Get your own stack.]]
			[[File:Herbert Hoover.jpg\|thumb\|[[Herbert Hoover\|This guy]] knows a thing or two about the economy. Look up "hooverville" for more details.]]

	This is just too obvious, and also too easy, like taking [[candy]] from a [[baby]]. But try, for example, accusing someone of committing the "Lump of Labor" fallacy, or some [[gay]] shit like that (and don't forget to also [http://groups.google.com/group/alt.politics.immigration/tree/browse_frm/thread/9ec4174fdd493db0/7b0c1d449f82f729?rnum=41&hl=en&_done=%2Fgroup%2Falt.politics.immigration%2Fbrowse_frm%2Fthread%2F9ec4174fdd493db0%2F65d61bc29c1a7b55%3Ftvc%3D1%26hl%3Den%26#doc_8382dfc9617b7525 flame his spelling]). Or try telling a bunch of [[woman\|hysterical]] [[fucktard]]s that they should like [[Wal-Mart]] because it creates jobs.[http://community.livejournal.com/anti_sweatshops/2150.html#t7782] If you come across a math type then one can ask for a mathematical proof of the viability of the fractional reserve system under dynamic conditions. When one needs to end an argument and return his broker's margin call, one need simply post high-resolution pictures of gold, guns, or ammo and pawn any economic argument.		This is just too obvious, and also too easy, like taking [[candy]] from a [[baby]]. But try, for example, accusing someone of committing the "Lump of Labor" fallacy, or some [[gay]] shit like that (and don't forget to also [http://groups.google.com/group/alt.politics.immigration/tree/browse_frm/thread/9ec4174fdd493db0/7b0c1d449f82f729?rnum=41&hl=en&_done=%2Fgroup%2Falt.politics.immigration%2Fbrowse_frm%2Fthread%2F9ec4174fdd493db0%2F65d61bc29c1a7b55%3Ftvc%3D1%26hl%3Den%26#doc_8382dfc9617b7525 flame his spelling]). Or try telling a bunch of [[woman\|hysterical]] [[fucktard]]s that they should like [[Wal-Mart]] because it creates jobs.[http://community.livejournal.com/anti_sweatshops/2150.html#t7782] If you come across a math type then one can ask for a mathematical proof of the viability of the fractional reserve system under dynamic conditions. When one needs to end an argument and return his broker's margin call, one need simply post high-resolution pictures of gold, guns, or ammo and pawn any economic argument.

imported>Sidecar at 19:06, 4 May 2017

2017-05-04T19:06:06Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:06, 4 May 2017
Line 1:		Line 1:
	~~The '''~~[[~~shit~~\|~~economy]]''' is what organizes all of mankind's productive forces to combine their efforts and produce vital stuff like porn movies or mobile phones with [[at_least_100~~\|~~at least 100]] ring tones. As such it is, by definition~~, ~~the sum of all [[serious business~~]].		[[File:Friedrich von hayek.jpg\|thumb\|"Problem, paupers?"]]

	[[File:Economic systems.png\|thumb\|Different types of economic systems]]		[[File:Economic systems.png\|thumb\|Different types of economic systems]]
	[[File:Crazyeconomist.gif\|thumb\|Trust me your money, I am an economist]]		[[File:Crazyeconomist.gif\|thumb\|Trust me your money, I am an economist]]
			The '''[[shit\|economy]]''' is what organizes all of mankind's productive forces to combine their efforts and produce vital stuff like porn movies or mobile phones with [[at_least_100\|at least 100]] ring tones. As such it is, by definition, the sum of all [[serious business]].

	The principle is essentially this:		The principle is essentially this:

imported>Sidecar: /* External Links */

2017-02-25T21:58:44Z

External Links

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:58, 25 February 2017
Line 127:		Line 127:

	==External Links==		==External Links==
			[[File:Economies.png\|thumb\|right\|300px\|Try the one-step econofitness program at home today!<br><small>N.b., may have side-effects</small>]]
	* [http://www.hulu.com/watch/1389/saturday-night-live-dont-buy-stuff The surefire way to get out of debt] - [[Saturday Night Live\|DON'T BUY STUFF YOU CANNOT AFFORD]]		* [http://www.hulu.com/watch/1389/saturday-night-live-dont-buy-stuff The surefire way to get out of debt] - [[Saturday Night Live\|DON'T BUY STUFF YOU CANNOT AFFORD]]
	* [http://www.rdwarf.com/users/kioh H4x0r Economist.]		* [http://www.rdwarf.com/users/kioh H4x0r Economist.]

imported>Lolyunohavgudsoftware at 09:06, 16 October 2015

2015-10-16T09:06:01Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:06, 16 October 2015
Line 1:		Line 1:
	The '''[[shit\|economy]]''' is what organizes all of mankind's productive forces to combine their efforts and produce vital stuff like porn movies or mobile phones with [[at_least_100\|at least 100]] ring tones. As such it is, by definition, the sum of all [[serious business]].		The '''[[shit\|economy]]''' is what organizes all of mankind's productive forces to combine their efforts and produce vital stuff like porn movies or mobile phones with [[at_least_100\|at least 100]] ring tones. As such it is, by definition, the sum of all [[serious business]].

	[[File:Economic systems.png\|thumb\|Different types of economic systems]]		[[File:Economic systems.png\|thumb\|Different types of economic systems]]
	[[File:Crazyeconomist.gif\|thumb\|Trust me your money, I am an economist]]		[[File:Crazyeconomist.gif\|thumb\|Trust me your money, I am an economist]]
Line 5:		Line 6:
	The principle is essentially this:		The principle is essentially this:

	#X prints $10		# X prints $10
	#X loans $100 to Y		# X loans $100 to Y
	#X demands $110 from Y		# X demands $110 from Y
	#Y asks for $10 to pay the interest		# Y asks for $10 to pay the interest
	#X loans $10 to Y to pay the interest		# X loans $10 to Y to pay the interest
	#X demands $11 from Y		# X demands $11 from Y
	#Y asks for $1 to pay the interest		# Y asks for $1 to pay the interest
	#X loans $1 to Y to pay the interest		# X loans $1 to Y to pay the interest
	#X demands $1.10 from Y		# X demands $1.10 from Y

	...and so on. This system will continue forever with no problems whatsoever.		...and so on. This system will continue forever with no problems whatsoever.
Line 27:		Line 28:
	\|[[Greed]], for lack of a [[leet\|better word]], is good. Greed is right. Greed works. Greed clarifies, cuts through, and [[Why So Serious?\|captures the essence of the evolutionary spirit]]. Greed, [[CP\|in all of its forms]], [[Anime\|greed for life]], for money, for love, [[Porn\|knowledge]] has marked the upward surge of mankind".\|[[The Man\|Gordon Gecko]] in ''Wall Street''.		\|[[Greed]], for lack of a [[leet\|better word]], is good. Greed is right. Greed works. Greed clarifies, cuts through, and [[Why So Serious?\|captures the essence of the evolutionary spirit]]. Greed, [[CP\|in all of its forms]], [[Anime\|greed for life]], for money, for love, [[Porn\|knowledge]] has marked the upward surge of mankind".\|[[The Man\|Gordon Gecko]] in ''Wall Street''.
	}}		}}
	~~<br>~~

	== The [[Old]] Economy ==		== The [[Old]] Economy ==
Line 57:		Line 57:
	Under the New Economy markets were no longer controlled by the [[Jews]], but rather by a mysterious force known as the [[Jews\|Invisible Hand]]. This [[some argue\|led some to conclude]] that truly free markets were now possible for the first time. The main [[idiot\|believers in this theory]] were the so-called "day traders," who hoped to [[EXTREME ADVERTISING\|MAKE MONEY FAST]] by buying shares in ridiculous, no-future, loss-making dot-com ventures such as [[LiveJournal]] and [[Apple]]. In the end, unsurprisingly, [[Special:Listadmins\|the inside elite]] kept all the [[money]] and the "day traders" were left with [[jack]].		Under the New Economy markets were no longer controlled by the [[Jews]], but rather by a mysterious force known as the [[Jews\|Invisible Hand]]. This [[some argue\|led some to conclude]] that truly free markets were now possible for the first time. The main [[idiot\|believers in this theory]] were the so-called "day traders," who hoped to [[EXTREME ADVERTISING\|MAKE MONEY FAST]] by buying shares in ridiculous, no-future, loss-making dot-com ventures such as [[LiveJournal]] and [[Apple]]. In the end, unsurprisingly, [[Special:Listadmins\|the inside elite]] kept all the [[money]] and the "day traders" were left with [[jack]].

	=== ~~<span id="Economist_Magazine"></span>~~The ''Economist'' Magazine ===		=== The ''Economist'' Magazine ===

	[[Image:Great_tits.jpg\|thumb\|Only the highest of highbrow [[humor]] over there at the ''Economist''.]]		[[Image:Great_tits.jpg\|thumb\|Only the highest of highbrow [[humor]] over there at the ''Economist''.]]
Line 72:		Line 72:

	[[Image:Tableshoehatonhead.jpg\|thumb\|left\|How the Camwhore Economy works.]]		[[Image:Tableshoehatonhead.jpg\|thumb\|left\|How the Camwhore Economy works.]]
			[[Image:Good Economics.jpg\|thumb\|Sounds good to me.]]
	[[Image:Good Economics.jpg\|thumb~~\|right~~\|Sounds good to me.]]

	The immediate result of this was that [[at least 100\|thousands]] of workers in Silicon Valley and [[San Francisco]] suddenly found themselves laid off from their cushy, all-casual-dress, skateboard-around-the-office, unlimited-free-Nacho-Cheese-flavored-[http://www.doritos.com Doritos ®] [[jobs]]. But [http://groups.google.com/group/alt.fan.furry/msg/21391850df744e31?dmode=source&hl=en the entrepreneurial spirit soon reasserted itself] and rebuilt yet another New Economy on the ashes of the old.		The immediate result of this was that [[at least 100\|thousands]] of workers in Silicon Valley and [[San Francisco]] suddenly found themselves laid off from their cushy, all-casual-dress, skateboard-around-the-office, unlimited-free-Nacho-Cheese-flavored-[http://www.doritos.com Doritos ®] [[jobs]]. But [http://groups.google.com/group/alt.fan.furry/msg/21391850df744e31?dmode=source&hl=en the entrepreneurial spirit soon reasserted itself] and rebuilt yet another New Economy on the ashes of the old.
Line 88:		Line 87:

	[[Image:Lump_of_flame.jpg\|thumb\|[[Reason]]ed discussion of economic issues on [[Usenet]].]]		[[Image:Lump_of_flame.jpg\|thumb\|[[Reason]]ed discussion of economic issues on [[Usenet]].]]

	[[Image:For_great_economic_justice.jpg\|thumb\|It will all end in [[lulz\|tears]].]]		[[Image:For_great_economic_justice.jpg\|thumb\|It will all end in [[lulz\|tears]].]]

	[[Image:GoldandSilver.jpg\|thumb\|Get your own stack.]]		[[Image:GoldandSilver.jpg\|thumb\|Get your own stack.]]

	~~[[Image:GunsAndAmmo.jpg\|thumb\|Never leave home without it.]]~~

	This is just too obvious, and also too easy, like taking [[candy]] from a [[baby]]. But try, for example, accusing someone of committing the "Lump of Labor" fallacy, or some [[gay]] shit like that (and don't forget to also [http://groups.google.com/group/alt.politics.immigration/tree/browse_frm/thread/9ec4174fdd493db0/7b0c1d449f82f729?rnum=41&hl=en&_done=%2Fgroup%2Falt.politics.immigration%2Fbrowse_frm%2Fthread%2F9ec4174fdd493db0%2F65d61bc29c1a7b55%3Ftvc%3D1%26hl%3Den%26#doc_8382dfc9617b7525 flame his spelling]). Or try telling a bunch of [[woman\|hysterical]] [[fucktard]]s that they should like [[Wal-Mart]] because it creates jobs.[http://community.livejournal.com/anti_sweatshops/2150.html#t7782] If you come across a math type then one can ask for a mathematical proof of the viability of the fractional reserve system under dynamic conditions. When one needs to end an argument and return his broker's margin call, one need simply post high-resolution pictures of gold, guns, or ammo and pawn any economic argument.		This is just too obvious, and also too easy, like taking [[candy]] from a [[baby]]. But try, for example, accusing someone of committing the "Lump of Labor" fallacy, or some [[gay]] shit like that (and don't forget to also [http://groups.google.com/group/alt.politics.immigration/tree/browse_frm/thread/9ec4174fdd493db0/7b0c1d449f82f729?rnum=41&hl=en&_done=%2Fgroup%2Falt.politics.immigration%2Fbrowse_frm%2Fthread%2F9ec4174fdd493db0%2F65d61bc29c1a7b55%3Ftvc%3D1%26hl%3Den%26#doc_8382dfc9617b7525 flame his spelling]). Or try telling a bunch of [[woman\|hysterical]] [[fucktard]]s that they should like [[Wal-Mart]] because it creates jobs.[http://community.livejournal.com/anti_sweatshops/2150.html#t7782] If you come across a math type then one can ask for a mathematical proof of the viability of the fractional reserve system under dynamic conditions. When one needs to end an argument and return his broker's margin call, one need simply post high-resolution pictures of gold, guns, or ammo and pawn any economic argument.

imported>Boudica at 03:02, 3 December 2014

2014-12-03T03:02:22Z

← Older revision	Revision as of 03:02, 3 December 2014
(No difference)

imported>Boudica at 03:02, 3 December 2014

2014-12-03T03:02:22Z

← Older revision	Revision as of 03:02, 3 December 2014
(No difference)

imported>Boudica at 03:02, 3 December 2014

2014-12-03T03:02:22Z

← Older revision	Revision as of 03:02, 3 December 2014
(No difference)

imported>Boudica at 03:02, 3 December 2014

2014-12-03T03:02:22Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:02, 3 December 2014
Line 108:		Line 108:
	People who study the economy, stupid. See [[economist\|attached]].		People who study the economy, stupid. See [[economist\|attached]].

	==See ~~also~~==		==See Also==
			*[[Hugh Jidette]]
	* [[Spics]] - favorites of the Secretary of Commerce		*[[Bernie Madoff]]
	* [[Hugh Jidette]]		*[[The credit crunch]]
	* [[Bernie Madoff]]		*[[Tits or leave\|Supply and demand]]
	* [[The credit crunch]]		*[[Anti-Goatse Law\|Market regulation]]
	* [[Tits or leave\|Supply and demand]]		*[[Wishlist\|Executive compensation]]
	* [[Anti-Goatse Law\|Market regulation]]		*[[PITR\|Restraint of trade]]
	* [[Wishlist\|Executive compensation]]		*[[Libertarianism\|Austrian economics]]
	* [[PITR\|Restraint of trade]]		*[[Leftard\|Keynesian economics]]
	* [[Libertarianism\|Austrian economics]]		*[[Zombie\|Voodoo economics]]
	* [[Leftard\|Keynesian economics]]		*[[In the ass\|Asset price inflation]]
	* [[Zombie\|Voodoo economics]]		*[[Lowtax\|Tax policy]]
	* [[In the ass\|Asset price inflation]]		*[[Nazi\|Public Choice Theory]]
	* [[Lowtax\|Tax policy]]		*[[Why do liberals hate America?\|Mixed Market]]
	* [[Nazi\|Public Choice Theory]]		*[[Oral sex\|Consumption Function]]
	* [[Why do liberals hate America?\|Mixed Market]]		*[[Peter Schiff]]
	* [[Oral sex\|Consumption Function]]		*[[Rape dollars]]
	* [[Peter Schiff]]		*[[Jews]]
	* [[Rape dollars]]		*[[ERepublik]]
	* [[Jews]]		*[[Economist]]
	* [[ERepublik]]		*[[Zimbabwe]]
	* [[Economist]]
	* [[Zimbabwe]]

	==External Links==		==External Links==
Line 145:		Line 143:
	{{Business}}		{{Business}}

	[[Category:~~Locations~~]]		[[Category: Drama-generating_techniques]]
	[[Category:~~Shock Sites~~]]		[[Category: Locations]]

imported>Clovepasts at 01:00, 3 December 2014

2014-12-03T01:00:26Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:00, 3 December 2014
Line 146:		Line 146:

	[[Category:Locations]]		[[Category:Locations]]
	[[Category:~~Sock~~ Sites]]		[[Category:Shock Sites]]

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:27, 13 May 2026
Line 89:		Line 89:
	[[Image:For_great_economic_justice.jpg\|thumb\|It will all end in [[lulz\|tears]].]]		[[Image:For_great_economic_justice.jpg\|thumb\|It will all end in [[lulz\|tears]].]]
	[[Image:GoldandSilver.jpg\|thumb\|Get your own stack.]]		[[Image:GoldandSilver.jpg\|thumb\|Get your own stack.]]
	[[~~File~~:Herbert Hoover.jpg\|thumb\|[[Herbert Hoover\|This guy]] knows a thing or two about the economy. Look up "hooverville" for more details.]]		[[Image:Herbert Hoover.jpg\|thumb\|[[Herbert Hoover\|This guy]] knows a thing or two about the economy. Look up "hooverville" for more details.]]

	This is just too obvious, and also too easy, like taking [[candy]] from a [[baby]]. But try, for example, accusing someone of committing the "Lump of Labor" fallacy, or some [[gay]] shit like that (and don't forget to also [http://groups.google.com/group/alt.politics.immigration/tree/browse_frm/thread/9ec4174fdd493db0/7b0c1d449f82f729?rnum=41&hl=en&_done=%2Fgroup%2Falt.politics.immigration%2Fbrowse_frm%2Fthread%2F9ec4174fdd493db0%2F65d61bc29c1a7b55%3Ftvc%3D1%26hl%3Den%26#doc_8382dfc9617b7525 flame his spelling]). Or try telling a bunch of [[woman\|hysterical]] [[fucktard]]s that they should like [[Wal-Mart]] because it creates jobs.[http://community.livejournal.com/anti_sweatshops/2150.html#t7782] If you come across a math type then one can ask for a mathematical proof of the viability of the fractional reserve system under dynamic conditions. When one needs to end an argument and return his broker's margin call, one need simply post high-resolution pictures of gold, guns, or ammo and pawn any economic argument.		This is just too obvious, and also too easy, like taking [[candy]] from a [[baby]]. But try, for example, accusing someone of committing the "Lump of Labor" fallacy, or some [[gay]] shit like that (and don't forget to also [http://groups.google.com/group/alt.politics.immigration/tree/browse_frm/thread/9ec4174fdd493db0/7b0c1d449f82f729?rnum=41&hl=en&_done=%2Fgroup%2Falt.politics.immigration%2Fbrowse_frm%2Fthread%2F9ec4174fdd493db0%2F65d61bc29c1a7b55%3Ftvc%3D1%26hl%3Den%26#doc_8382dfc9617b7525 flame his spelling]). Or try telling a bunch of [[woman\|hysterical]] [[fucktard]]s that they should like [[Wal-Mart]] because it creates jobs.[http://community.livejournal.com/anti_sweatshops/2150.html#t7782] If you come across a math type then one can ask for a mathematical proof of the viability of the fractional reserve system under dynamic conditions. When one needs to end an argument and return his broker's margin call, one need simply post high-resolution pictures of gold, guns, or ammo and pawn any economic argument.

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:26, 13 May 2026
Line 89:		Line 89:
	[[Image:For_great_economic_justice.jpg\|thumb\|It will all end in [[lulz\|tears]].]]		[[Image:For_great_economic_justice.jpg\|thumb\|It will all end in [[lulz\|tears]].]]
	[[Image:GoldandSilver.jpg\|thumb\|Get your own stack.]]		[[Image:GoldandSilver.jpg\|thumb\|Get your own stack.]]
			[[File:Herbert Hoover.jpg\|thumb\|[[Herbert Hoover\|This guy]] knows a thing or two about the economy. Look up "hooverville" for more details.]]

	This is just too obvious, and also too easy, like taking [[candy]] from a [[baby]]. But try, for example, accusing someone of committing the "Lump of Labor" fallacy, or some [[gay]] shit like that (and don't forget to also [http://groups.google.com/group/alt.politics.immigration/tree/browse_frm/thread/9ec4174fdd493db0/7b0c1d449f82f729?rnum=41&hl=en&_done=%2Fgroup%2Falt.politics.immigration%2Fbrowse_frm%2Fthread%2F9ec4174fdd493db0%2F65d61bc29c1a7b55%3Ftvc%3D1%26hl%3Den%26#doc_8382dfc9617b7525 flame his spelling]). Or try telling a bunch of [[woman\|hysterical]] [[fucktard]]s that they should like [[Wal-Mart]] because it creates jobs.[http://community.livejournal.com/anti_sweatshops/2150.html#t7782] If you come across a math type then one can ask for a mathematical proof of the viability of the fractional reserve system under dynamic conditions. When one needs to end an argument and return his broker's margin call, one need simply post high-resolution pictures of gold, guns, or ammo and pawn any economic argument.		This is just too obvious, and also too easy, like taking [[candy]] from a [[baby]]. But try, for example, accusing someone of committing the "Lump of Labor" fallacy, or some [[gay]] shit like that (and don't forget to also [http://groups.google.com/group/alt.politics.immigration/tree/browse_frm/thread/9ec4174fdd493db0/7b0c1d449f82f729?rnum=41&hl=en&_done=%2Fgroup%2Falt.politics.immigration%2Fbrowse_frm%2Fthread%2F9ec4174fdd493db0%2F65d61bc29c1a7b55%3Ftvc%3D1%26hl%3Den%26#doc_8382dfc9617b7525 flame his spelling]). Or try telling a bunch of [[woman\|hysterical]] [[fucktard]]s that they should like [[Wal-Mart]] because it creates jobs.[http://community.livejournal.com/anti_sweatshops/2150.html#t7782] If you come across a math type then one can ask for a mathematical proof of the viability of the fractional reserve system under dynamic conditions. When one needs to end an argument and return his broker's margin call, one need simply post high-resolution pictures of gold, guns, or ammo and pawn any economic argument.

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:06, 4 May 2017
Line 1:		Line 1:
	~~The '''~~[[~~shit~~\|~~economy]]''' is what organizes all of mankind's productive forces to combine their efforts and produce vital stuff like porn movies or mobile phones with [[at_least_100~~\|~~at least 100]] ring tones. As such it is, by definition~~, ~~the sum of all [[serious business~~]].		[[File:Friedrich von hayek.jpg\|thumb\|"Problem, paupers?"]]

	[[File:Economic systems.png\|thumb\|Different types of economic systems]]		[[File:Economic systems.png\|thumb\|Different types of economic systems]]
	[[File:Crazyeconomist.gif\|thumb\|Trust me your money, I am an economist]]		[[File:Crazyeconomist.gif\|thumb\|Trust me your money, I am an economist]]
			The '''[[shit\|economy]]''' is what organizes all of mankind's productive forces to combine their efforts and produce vital stuff like porn movies or mobile phones with [[at_least_100\|at least 100]] ring tones. As such it is, by definition, the sum of all [[serious business]].

	The principle is essentially this:		The principle is essentially this: